Rising Cost of Disturbances for European Forestry Under Climate Change
- Hakan Sener
- 5 days ago
- 6 min read
Climate-driven wildfires, pest outbreaks, and storms could double Europe's forestry losses from €115 billion to €247 billion under severe warming.
A recent study led by Johannes S. Mohr (Technical University of Munich) couples spatially explicit forest growth simulations, over 150,000 Monte Carlo disturbance scenarios, and economic modeling to quantify current and future costs of natural disturbances across 91 million hectares—two-thirds of Europe's forest area.
The research reveals disturbance-induced losses currently total €115 billion under historical climate conditions (1981-2005), with average annual costs of €1.7 billion. Under severe climate change (RCP8.5 scenario, 2076-2100), total losses surge to €247 billion with annual costs reaching €3.7 billion—representing up to 15% of Europe's current forestry sector gross value added.
Key Findings: Doubling Costs Under Climate Change
Historical baseline establishes current burden
Under 1981-2005 climate conditions, natural disturbances cost European forestry €115 ± 3 billion in lost forest value, averaging €1,265 per hectare. Disturbances reduced total forest value by 28.6% compared to undisturbed development, driven by 74.5 million cubic meters of timber disturbed annually.
These costs encompass losses from wildfires, windstorms, and bark beetle outbreaks—the three most important disturbance agents across Europe's commercially dominant species: European beech, Norway spruce, Scots pine, and deciduous oaks.
Climate change doubles disturbance burden
Future timber harvest increased 17.1% under moderate warming (RCP4.5), rising from 259.6 to 304.1 million cubic meters annually, driven by both increasing productivity and disturbance. However, unplanned disturbance-related harvests surged disproportionately, pushing total costs to €186 billion under RCP4.5.
Under severe climate change (RCP8.5), costs escalated to €247 ± 15 billion—reducing potential forest value by 42.1% relative to undisturbed conditions. Average costs per unit area increased from €1,265 to €2,715 per hectare, with annual costs rising to €3,711 million.
Central Europe emerges as disturbance cost hotspot
Central Europe—particularly Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Czech Republic—faces the steepest economic impacts. Under moderate warming (RCP4.5), average disturbance costs reached €3,233 per hectare, escalating to €4,375 per hectare under severe warming.
Extreme costs in this region (worst 5% of simulations) hit €17,067 per hectare under RCP4.5, reaching €19,885 per hectare under RCP8.5. Northern Europe experienced 60-65% lower average costs (€1,164 per hectare under RCP4.5), though local extremes still exceeded €10,000 per hectare.
Productivity Gains Show Regional Variation
Northern Europe benefits from warming
Climate-driven productivity increases under warming scenarios overcompensated disturbance losses across Europe overall, but regional variation proved substantial. Productivity gains stemmed from two effects: higher initial growing stocks and increased sustainable harvest levels from elevated tree growth.
Northern Europe emerged as the primary beneficiary, with economic gains from increasing productivity clearly outweighing disturbance-mediated losses under climate change. These patterns align with previous assessments showing boreal zones gaining forest value under warming.
Southern Europe faces compound losses
In stark contrast, productivity stagnated or declined in Southern Europe while disturbances increased, resulting in decreasing net forest values under climate change. The timber-based forest value in Southern Europe—already considerably lower than other continental regions—will decrease further under warming.
Central Europe showed intermediate patterns, with productivity projected to increase albeit at lower rates than Northern Europe. Economic losses from disturbances were compensated by productivity gains, yet offset capacity decreased with increasing climate severity.
Scenario uncertainty escalates with warming
Only under mild climate change (RCP2.6) were forest values in all European regions (and 92% of all countries) projected to increase relative to historical levels when considering net effects of changing productivity and disturbance. Scenario uncertainty remained lowest under RCP2.6 but increased considerably with climate severity.
Overall forest value showed little variation across scenarios (RCP2.6: €337.9 billion, RCP4.5: €328.6 billion, RCP8.5: €340.8 billion) as productivity and disturbance effects increased at similar rates, yet the escalating uncertainty under severe warming poses major planning challenges.
Disturbance Mechanisms and Economic Impacts
Background versus extreme disturbances
The analysis incorporated two disturbance types: climate-sensitive background disturbances (small- to medium-scale regular mortality from drought, insects, or small windthrow) and stochastic landscape-scale extreme events (severe fires, windstorms, and massive bark beetle outbreaks).
Background disturbances were modeled using statistical survival probabilities sensitive to changing temperature and precipitation patterns. Extreme events were defined as those affecting more than twice the average annual disturbed area, with frequencies derived from remote sensing data and scaled to future scenarios using Taylor's power law.
Market crashes amplify extreme event costs
Economic impacts varied by disturbance type. Background disturbances reduced net revenue by 50% due to timber quality loss and increased harvesting costs. Extreme events triggered more severe consequences: timber revenues dropped to zero for affected areas, representing complete market collapse from disturbed timber flooding regional markets.
Extreme disturbances also doubled establishment costs for replanting, reflecting higher post-disturbance expenses and typical nursery shortages after large events. These combined effects explain why extreme disturbances disproportionately impact the economic damage distribution's fat tail.
How They Did It
The team coupled three crucial modeling elements across a 16×16 km spatial grid covering 91 million hectares: (1) spatially explicit forest growth simulations for individual tree species using a matrix model, (2) over 150,000 Monte Carlo simulations of disturbances informed by remote sensing data, and (3) economic models converting planned and unplanned timber harvests to discounted cashflow.
Forest productivity under climate change was quantified using a deep neural network trained on 14 million data points from the process-based iLand model, predicting potential net primary productivity across Europe's full climate and soil gradients. Three representative concentration pathway (RCP) scenarios from multiple climate models represented mild (RCP2.6), moderate (RCP4.5), and severe (RCP8.5) warming for period 2076-2100.
Disturbance scenarios assumed mean increases by factors of 2, 4, and 6 for RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5 respectively, based on projected drought intensification and observed responses to recent warming. Monte Carlo simulations (100 runs per scenario per cell) captured stochastic variability in disturbance timing and location. Economic costs were calculated as the difference between simulations with and without disturbances under identical climate conditions, using a 1.5% discount rate.
Adaptation Potential and Limitations
Rotation period adjustments offer modest relief
Simulating a moderate 10-year shortening of rotation periods—a frequently discussed adaptation measure—reduced disturbance costs by up to €10 billion under RCP8.5. Rotation periods were optimally adjusted per cell to maximize net present value under changing productivity conditions, effectively shortening where productivity increased and extending where it declined.
However, such measures carry trade-offs for non-timber ecosystem services including carbon storage and habitat value, requiring careful consideration of local conditions before implementation.
Conservative estimates mask full impacts
Several factors suggest the analysis provides conservative cost estimates. The study focused exclusively on timber-related forest values, omitting broader societal costs from disturbance impacts on non-marketable ecosystem services like recreation, water quality, and biodiversity.
The analysis considered only the three most important disturbance agents (wildfires, windstorms, bark beetles), excluding emerging threats like invasive alien pests and pathogens that could substantially alter future regimes. Lower salvage harvest rates than assumed—increasingly likely given ecological criticisms of the practice—would further increase economic costs.
Why Climate Adaptation Matters for Forestry
Economic imperative for adaptation: Annual losses under severe warming could reach 15% of Europe's current forestry sector gross value added. Central Europe hotspots face extreme per-hectare costs (€19,885) that could become prohibitive for regular forest management without adaptive measures like planting less disturbance-prone species and managing for structured, mixed forests.
Disturbance risk ignored in past planning: Even-aged coniferous forests were historically propagated on economic grounds that ignored substantial disturbance risk and associated costs. Future forest planning must explicitly account for disturbance impacts as they increase under climate change.
Regional inequality deepens: Northern Europe benefits from warming through productivity gains exceeding disturbance losses, while Southern Europe—already economically disadvantaged—faces compound losses from stagnating productivity and rising disturbances. Central Europe experiences intermediate but escalating impacts as climate severity increases.
Mitigation prevents worst outcomes: Only under mild climate change (RCP2.6) did net positive economic effects emerge continent-wide. Largely unmitigated warming (RCP8.5) leads to severe losses particularly in Southern and Central Europe, demonstrating that climate mitigation can avoid substantial forestry sector costs.
A Continental Economic Crossroads
This study provides the first continental-scale estimate of forest disturbance costs for Europe, revealing that climate change could more than double economic losses from natural disturbances while creating stark regional inequalities. The convergence of spatially explicit growth modeling, comprehensive disturbance simulation, and economic valuation offers unprecedented insight into forestry's climate vulnerability.
The researchers' integration of 150,000+ Monte Carlo scenarios with climate-sensitive productivity estimates captures both the mean impacts and extreme tail risks that disproportionately affect forest economics. As Central Europe emerges as a disturbance cost hotspot with potential losses approaching €20,000 per hectare, the imperative for both climate adaptation and mitigation becomes clear—not merely as ecological necessity but as economic survival for Europe's timber-dependent communities and industries.
Sign up for our newsletter or connect with us on social media to stay up-to-date with our latest posts and permaculture inspiration.
Explore our inspiring series and posts:
Love the post? Share it with your circle, inspire your people.